<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>C&#43;&#43; on Briar Patch</title>
    <link>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/tags/c&#43;&#43;/</link>
    <description>Recent content in C&#43;&#43; on Briar Patch</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:46:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://briar-patch.neocities.org/tags/c++/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Death of Design Patterns</title>
      <link>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/posts/death_design_patterns/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:46:51 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/posts/death_design_patterns/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every now and then, I see &lt;em&gt;Design Patterns&lt;/em&gt; floated as a kind of next-step resource for&#xA;programmers after they&amp;rsquo;ve gotten comfortable with a language, typically an object-oriented&#xA;(or at least object-aware) one. I don&amp;rsquo;t particularly have a problem with OOP as a concept,&#xA;though I agree with its critics that inheritance is overused in teaching materials by several&#xA;orders of magnitude.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But as for &lt;em&gt;Design Patterns&lt;/em&gt; itself, I personally think these days that it only serves as a window into&#xA;90s programming philosophy - a historical relic of a bygone age, and one that I&amp;rsquo;m not all&#xA;that interested in revisiting (unlike my passion for &lt;em&gt;Software Tools&lt;/em&gt; from the 70s).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Something Nicer</title>
      <link>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/posts/mpi_parser/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:23:35 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/posts/mpi_parser/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I realize I keep bouncing between screeds and fun little project summaries like a meth-addled squirrel, but&#xA;I don&amp;rsquo;t want everything I write to be depressing or angry. It would be far too easy to do that, in all honesty,&#xA;so I&amp;rsquo;m making myself look on the bright side.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In this case, you might remember me saying something about the flexibility of MUCK descriptions in my &lt;a href=&#34;../line_by_line&#34;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;about the line editor project. It went a bit like this:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Line by line</title>
      <link>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/posts/line_by_line/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:55:04 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://briar-patch.neocities.org/posts/line_by_line/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;ancient-history&#34;&gt;Ancient History&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Since I talked about building things last time, it&amp;rsquo;s only fair I share the things I&amp;rsquo;ve been working on. A lot recently has been inspired by old tech.&#xA;Some of it is probably nostalgia for an era I didn&amp;rsquo;t really get to experience, but some of it is genuine delight. Lately I&amp;rsquo;ve been excited by the&#xA;cutting edge of early-90s internet - the MUCK.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The hell is that? Well, it&amp;rsquo;s a less grind-oriented variant of the multi-user dungeon (MUD).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
